Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Harley King's avatar

Mardy, I appreciate the quality of your writing. Amazing. I love the Dan Fogelberg song. I heard a story about John Wesley years ago. Wesley drew large crowds to his meetings and someone asked him why. He reportedly said: “I put John Wesley on fire and people come to watch him burn.” I don’t know if it is true.

Expand full comment
William Cleveland's avatar

Thanks for doing Good with another thought provoking post. Happy Father's Day, indeed!

One Bible passage you might find illuminating is James 2:14-26 with a commentary about faith without works is dead.

Building on the mystery person, the Wesleys directly inspired the Booths who founded The Salvation Army, an organization, which is at its core a church, in which the officers (the ones you see in the iconic military-style uniforms), all of whom are ordained ministers, appear to live their faith by their works and encouraging other to do likewise. This church has become among the largest charities in the world and around 15 years ago adopted the tagline "Doing the Most Good." I'm not a huge fan of the tagline, because good is in the eye of the beholder. This could be seen as someone imposing their faith on others through their works, although my nearly decade of involvement with the organization has not revealed this to be the case with their works.

While the Salvation Army serves without discrimination and is generally lifting others up, we all can undoubtedly think of the numerous examples where religious zealots have done their version of "good" by cleansing the world of what they perceive as evil through murder and other sub-homicidal malicious acts. I struggle to see how people who claim to be Christians would murder others in Jesus' name, since I don't understand how that could in any way be considered an example of Jesus' core message of "love your neighbor."

Echoing Arlene's comment and my response to you about the "Charity" post from a couple of weeks ago, works of good should be looked at from the perspective of the receiver and not the giver. When the act of "goodness" is from the giver's perspective, it could result in birdshit philanthropy, where the giver drops off something no longer useful to the giver without regard for what it does for the receiver. As noted in my previous communication, this can be paralyzing and create dependence rather than independence. An economy-wide example of this is all the charity pouring into Haiti that has systematically driven local businesses bankrupt, like the rice farmers who cannot compete with free, and created a country that has difficulty providing for itself.

Expand full comment
26 more comments...

No posts